|
|||
Characterization checklist for Roller Compaction equipment selection
(taken and adapted from: Walzenkompaktierung, M. Bultmann; ISBN 3-xxxxxxxx-x in preparation)
Property / feature | units | explanation | value / data |
Vendor / model | specify | n/a | |
Roll diameter | [mm] | ||
Roll width | [mm] | ||
different roll surfaces available | smooth polished smooth satinated knurled other (please specify) |
to accommodate different draw in properties | |
variable gap system | yes / no | variable gap systems are prerequisite for constant porosity = high quality | |
all unit sizes available (from lab size to production size | yes / no | to cover all steps without major equipment change | |
all unit sizes use same roll diameter | yes / no | ease of scale up | |
all unit sizes use same design | yes / no | ease of scale up: no change in design related parameters | |
max. throughput1 | [kg/h] | ||
min amount of powder | [g] | for development porposes: the less the better | |
quasi contained production zone by default while area still visible (e.g. perspex door) | yes / no | health and safety issues, facilitate cleaning but still allowing observation of process | |
flanges /ports easily attachable to inlet and outlet | yes / no | allow switch to contained operation or from small scale development to full production easily | |
contained version available (containment has to be proven by data !) | genuine by vendor third party working with vendor not at all |
total solution from vendor provides best overall performance | |
relative roll position |
inclined vertical horizontal |
horizontal: might cause issues with material flowing through the gap by itself: poor vertical: different draw in angles at the rolls: poor |
|
designed for reduced surfaces (pay attention to nuts, covers, sealings, welding seams) | yes / no | sophisticated design implies reduction of welding seams (milled from solid block preferred), avoidance of nuts and bolts, covering of them wherever possible, tight sealings between drive shafts and housing | |
WIP available | yes / no | facilitates cleaning (under contained conditions); health and safety | |
CIP available | yes / no | provides cleaning (under contained conditions); health and safety | |
number of augers | 2 / 1 | two auger systems provide high flexibility from predensification to aeration of powder. Widens range of processable material | |
predensifying augers | no / yes | predensification should not be forced by default by auger design | |
cooling of rolls available | yes / no | widens range of processable materials to products with low melting point / low degradation temp. | |
working2(!) rim roll sealing available | yes / no | rim rolls provide more uniform porosity distribution across ribbon; but must be a real working rim principle. Ribbons must show plain sharp edges | |
adjustable speed ratio between augers | yes / no | allow high flexibility from predensification to aeration of powder. Widens range of processable material | |
torque control for feed auger | yes / no | allows to provide material of constant predensification to tamping screw | |
recycling of fines necessary | no / yes | uncompacted) fines should not occur right after compaction (optimization of formulation necessary or machine not working properly).Fines will occur after milling of course, but recycling them is not suggested for several reasons | |
automatic gap control with adjustable(!) PID parameters | yes / no | automatic mode provides constant gap at constant force. PID parameters must be adjustable to offer potential for adaption to product if necessary | |
Granulation unit attached | yes / no | reduces processing steps, facilitates containment | |
low speed3 granulation plus granulator speed plus angle of rotation plus direction adjustable | yes / no | high milling speeds produce lots of fines. Granulator movement should be adjustable to match individual needs / throughput | |
ease of rotor sieve distance adjustment (reproducibility !) | fool proof … hard to adjust, not adjustable | rotor sieve distance becomes important under certain circumstances. distance adjustment should be made easy and reproducible | |
mesh sizes available | please specify | ||
conidur sieves available as standard option | yes / no | conidur sieves provide more cutting action and can help to reduce fines. On the other hand through put is limited | |
Sample theif/chute for ribbons | yes / no | necessary for drawing ribbons | |
sample thief/chute for granules | yes / no | necessary for drawing granule samples | |
Different agitator shapes available | yes / no | widen range of processable material (aeration or just movement instead of predensification in feeding hopper) | |
creeping mode with(!) ramp | yes / no | saves material (especially relevant for development); fast steady state | |
tip mode for each drive individually selectable | yes / no | relevant for cleaning | |
rolls and tamping auger reverse tip mode available | yes / no | required in case of clogging | |
full instrumentation of all(!) drives (speed, torque, temperature); similar for hydraulic pump | yes / no | better process understanding, ease of trackin process, usable for QbD, PAT | |
Data export function | yes / no | tracability and evaluation of process and parameters; necessary for development | |
dynamic (!) force calibration (force exerted on powder) | yes / no | truly displays the actual force on the powder leaving all other influencing factors beside (oil leakage, bear friction, lever bending…) | |
dynamic (!) gap calibration | yes / no | assure that gap display is accurate for all force settings | |
(proven!) spare time delivery | instant .. | the faster the better, of course | |
CFR 21 / 11 compliant | yes / no | self explaining | |
through the wall assembly available | yes / no | save lab space, facilitate cleaning and maintenance in high potent production zones | |
experience available within own company | yes / no | roll er compaction is a complex topic. advantage of inhouse experience is self explaining | |
machine displays the actual force exerted on the powder (rather than hydraulic pressure or a force measured somewhere in the machine) | yes / no | anything else doesn't make much sense. actual force on the powder facilitates scale up | |
consistent with internal equipment and process of choice documents) | yes / no | self explaining |